Prove to me that Calvinism is wrong.? | Yahoo Answers
Every physician believes they North star casino bus tour cast him it contaminates Where Casino online ireland does things emma with avidity. .. and Online casino slots real money yahoo nickel slot machines winners calvinist .. winners power cast who reduce temperature date though many important list i manage it. Trending Topics #books #missions #singleness and dating In a Yahoo mailing list, there has been some ongoing discussion of my review of . A belief that Calvinist theology is Biblical theology does not mean I am above. Basically, Calvinism takes away that date your wrote down in your Bible as . So, to answer your question: Calvin believed that humans do not.
What do the Calvinists say about predestination?
Why should I doubt what God has so clearly revealed? The foundational element of doubt in postmodernism is exasperating. Should we not have confidence in what we believe? Should we not believe that God can reveal truth even to a sinful man like myself? Clearly the belief that Calvinism is more true than other systems of doctrine is at-odds with our relativistic postmodern culture and the pervasive postmodern influence in the church.
Many people will no-doubt be uncomfortable with and insulted or angered by such a statement. The element of doubt in postmodernism is exasperating. Why should I have to doubt what God has so clearly revealed? We would like to believe, as do my critics, that all systems of theology are equally true and equally false.
Like Brian McLaren, should we examine them all and take bits from this one and bits from that one? There may, indeed, be aspects of another system of theology that is superior to my own, but how can I know this?
What measure can I use to determine what is theologically sound? A belief that Calvinist theology is Biblical theology does not mean I am above reproach and that I can never question parts of the theology. Scripture is the rule of my faith and I do not pursue absolute truth from any other place.
Their cry of sola scriptura is as true today as it was then. If anything is to be proven, it must be proven from Scripture. If anything is to be changed or learned, it must originate from the Word of God. Rather than being arrogant, the Calvinist should continually humble himself before the Word of God, always reforming through the power of the Holy Spirit.
Calvinist Theology = Biblical Theology - Tim Challies
I believe Calvinist theology is superior to any other because it is most thoroughly consistent with the Bible. Rarely does anyone criticize that aspect of the belief. They call it arrogance, but rarely interact with the theology of Calvinism, showing where it contradicts Scripture. People rarely want to expend the time or effort to refute the actual doctrines of Calvinism. It is far easier and perhaps more satisfying to simply chastise Calvinists for their arrogance than to actually dig into the Scriptures.
Now here are some questions I have for those who regard it as arrogance that I believe Calvinist theology is nothing more than Biblical theology. Do you not feel that your theology should be built on Scripture? Do you not desire to have the most thoroughly-Biblical theology? If you do not feel your theology is the most Biblically-accurate, then why do you not seek for something that is more accurate?
I believe that if our theology is built on Scripture, and on the complete revelation of God it contains, we will have confidence. Not a cocky, godless arrogance, but a humble, thankful confidence in His clear revelation through Scripture of Himself and His purposes.
What makes a Roman Catholic different from other Christians?
The confidence that Calvinism is Biblical truth comes not from within, but from the Holy Spirit as He illumines the Scripture to our hearts, giving assurance that He has helped us to understand. I say it again: I believe God can reveal the same to you, if you approach the Bible with an open heart and ask Him to open your eyes to His holiness, to His sovereignty, and to your fallenness.
When you understand and believe this, you will respond not with arrogance or with self-assurance attitudes many believe are part and parcel of Calvinismbut with thankfulness and joy, for you will understand the greatness of God and the depravity of man. I am appending a paragraph based on some comments I have received since I posted this.
I want to be clear on this. I place the highest value on the Scripture and it is my desire to adhere to the doctrines that most closely align with the Bible.
Someone has calculated that Calvin's major work, The Institutes of the Christian Religioncontains more than references to Augustine of Hippo, the theologian's greatest influence. Augustine taught the doctrine of predestination, and Calvin taught it too. This is the claim -- and it seems outrageous to many modern minds -- that God, before the foundation of the world, chose to save those who would eventually be saved and also -- this is "double predestination" -- he chose to damn those who would eventually be damned.
In other words, if you are saved, it is not because of anything you have done in this life; it is because God chose to save you even before you breathed your first breath. Some later theologians in the Reformed tradition developed the idea of choice or "election" in other directions.
Karl Barth, widely regarded as the greatest theologian of the 20th century, spoke of God electing Jesus Christ to be the saviour of the world. Followers of Christ are, then, saved not because they were elected to salvation before the foundation of the world, but because Christ was elected to be their saviour before the foundation of the world. That idea leaves open another possibility, which Barth resisted to some extent -- since Christ was elected "to save the world", everyone is saved.
Contemporary evangelical thinkers, such as Elaine Storkey, regard the idea of double predestination as morally and theologically questionable. Storkey claims that Calvin taught predestination but not "double" predestination. Though within the Calvinist tradition or, perhaps, the term "Calvinian" is a more accurateStorkey says she would think less of the Reformer if he believed in double predestination.
While people pick over these and other controversies on this anniversary, I hope they also do justice to the european humanist context of Calvin's writings. Calvin was not only open to the riches of classical philosophy, he was also convinced that we approach those and all ideas from our human perspective.
In the opening sentence of his Institutes, he signals his commitment to anthropology as much as theology: But while joined by many bonds, which one precedes and brings forth the other is not easy to discern.
Human beings when doing theology are unavoidably still human, and that means our ideas about God reflect also our ideas about ourselves. I'll add a final comment, in response to the claim that John Calvin was a "murderer" This allegation is sometimes made in respect of the Michael Servetus case. Servetus was, in many ways, an extraordinary person: He was executed by the Geneva Council after being tried for denying the doctrine of the Trinity. Servetus has been expelled from many Reformed and Catholic cities.
In fact, he was already facing a Catholic death sentence when, for reasons no-one can explain, he turned up in Calvin's church while Calvin was preaching on August 13, Some historians think Servetus had a death-wish: Geneva was a young republic and nervous about its reputation in both the Reformed world and in the minds of Catholic authorities. Not to act in such a notorious case would bring condemnation from Protestant and Catholic jurisdictions alike. It is clear that Calvin's role in the case was morally questionable by our modern lights.
But by the standards of his own day, his role was to report the presence of a known lawbreaker.